It’s probable that no structures ever built by humans command more wonder than the pyramids of Giza. Everything about these funeral monuments beggars description. Their size is monumental. The pyramids of Giza also stand out from the landscape around them in a way that few other structures do. They give the appearance of awesome power personified.
Today, I’ll describe some things about the pyramids of Giza. Some things are well-known, while others might surprise you. This post is also the first of a series on the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Look for the others as I post them.
Who Built the Pyramids of Giza?
One thing most people remember about the pyramids (there are three at Giza) is that they are burial monuments for Egyptian pharaohs. Specifically, pharaohs of the Fourth Dynasty. The rulers entombed within were Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure. The oldest pyramid, that of Khufu, was finished circa 2560 BCE. This makes it more than forty-five centuries old.
Of course, Khufu played no role in building the pyramid itself. Exactly who did seems to be an open question. For years, people assumed that slaves had done the work. Now, experts lean toward the belief that the workers were paid laborers. Some workers were buried in places of honor near the structures they helped erect.
Click Here to Subscribe to Rob’s History Blog!
How Were They Built?
The techniques of construction likewise are open to question. After all, how did the workers get stone blocks weighing 2.5 tons each that high in the air? The prevailing view is that engineers constructed ramps, and that the blocks (there are 2.3 million stone blocks in Khufu’s pyramid!) were levered and rollered up the ramps until put into place.
The astounding size of the constructions have caused people to wonder how the Egyptian pharaohs could’ve commanded enough labor to finish such a project in anyone’s lifetime. Again, researchers have called old assumptions about this into question. For years, the prevailing thought was that about 100,000 people worked seasonally on construction. When the Nile River was in flood, that left plenty of people available to build pyramids. But now, beliefs tend toward the idea that the workforce was smaller but permanent—say 20,000 regular workers. That’s still a huge number.
This makes sense from the efficiency standpoint. Permanent workers are more skilled and work more quickly than occasional ones.
Click Here to Get Your Free Ebook of Rob’s First Novel!
Fun Facts About the Pyramids of Giza
The engineering skill was incredible. Khufu’s pyramid was 481 feet tall. Each side is exactly 755.75 feet in length at its base. Each side orients perfectly to one of the four cardinal directions. The pyramid’s base is perfectly level—less than 1.5 inches of deviation from its highest to lowest point.
The structures we see today are less impressive than when built. Each had a limestone facing, smoothing the appearance of the sides and giving them a sheen in sunlight. Egyptologists speculate the top of Khufu’s pyramid was gilded, although this is uncertain.
For my mathematically inclined readers, here are some more facts you’ll appreciate. The perimeter of the base of Khufu’s pyramid, divided by twice its height, is pi. But that’s not all.
One can inscribe a right triangle into the pyramid, with the shortest side of the triangle being the distance from the pyramid’s center to its side at its base. If this distance is one unit, the hypotenuse of this triangle will be phi, the Golden Ratio (1.618). This is true of Khufu’s pyramid to three decimal places.
Clearly the World’s Greatest Wonder?
Well, maybe. It depends on your standards. And I’m not referring to size. The Mayans and other peoples of Mesoamerica built some really big pyramids, too. But think of the labor and resources used to create these structures. Khufu’s pyramid required stone blocks weighing 5,000 pounds apiece. Workers had to quarry these stones and transport them to Giza by ship on the Nile River. Workers offloaded these blocks, moved them to the construction site, moved them up ramps by rollers and levers, and finally put them into place. This had to happen 2.3 million times. Put another way, that’s 315 times per day for 20 years.
All of this begs the question—couldn’t these resources (human and material) have been used to better purpose than celebrating a dead person?
That’s my point about the word great. The pyramids are a great achievement, artistically and technologically. But they are a great waste in all other ways.
Too Much Greatness?
Likewise with rulers labeled “the Great.” All that means, typically, is that they excelled at killing people and conquering territory. Is that really greatness?
It was, maybe, to people from the past who categorized them. But we don’t live in that past any longer. And I’ll argue it’s crucial the world jettison this view of greatness. To give one example why, consider Russia’s baseless invasion of the Ukraine. Why do so? Part of the reason is that Moscow wants to recover some of its influence from the Cold War era. National greatness, in other words.
I think the same applies to “heroes” from the history of industrialization. People like Rockefeller and Carnegie grew rich from grinding the bones of their workers into powder. Literally, in the case of the Ludlow Massacre approved and supported by John Rockefeller Jr. in 1914. Sure, people like Cornelius Vanderbilt built libraries and founded universities later. Would anyone have needed their philanthropy, though, if they’d been paid decent money to begin with?
You get the point. I love people who reach for greatness. Trying to excel at what you do is a great purpose to have in life. But I loathe those whose success comes at the expense of others. So, let’s keep greatness. But let’s keep a greatness in creativity, honest effort, and compassion rather than a greatness based on dominance and accumulation at the expense of others.
Please Subscribe!
If you enjoyed this blog, please sign up to follow it by scrolling down or clicking here, and recommending it to your friends. I’d love to have you aboard! You can also join the more than 1,000 members of my Readers Club for Rob Bauer Books by clicking here or like me on Facebook and Instagram. Please check out my historical fiction novels, too. If you find this information valuable, supporting me helps keep this blog going.
As always, I welcome constructive and polite discussion in the comments section. Thank you!
I’m not so sure their construction was a waste. They are more than just fancy tombs. First, it brought fame and respect to Egypt for centuries. Few people remember who is buried there, but everyone knows that the pyramids are in Egypt. Did it make future invaders think twice about trying to take over a civilization that could do such a feat? Even today, Egypt gets $10-12 billion per year in tourism revenue. Without the pyramids, Egypt might be as much of an attraction to Westerners as Libya ($170M) or Ethiopia ($3B).
Second, I would compare the pyramids’ construction to the moon landings. We had a few people walk around on the moon then come back home. Seems wasteful on the surface with all the other places the money could have gone. But the massive amount of science knowledge generated by the moon landing made the exercise worth it. Likewise, I’m confident that the Egyptians learned as they built and that those advances stayed with them for centuries to come.
Finally, I think you’re being awfully tough on people (the Egyptians, not the robber barons) who didn’t have the accumulated knowledge of philosophy, ethics, logic, etc. as we have today. Rather, they should be judged against their contemporaries.
Thanks for the post. I’m curious to see how you rank the other six.
Hi Steve, thanks for the comment. I can answer a few of the questions you pose.
Did the pyramids makes others reconsider invading Egypt? The Hyksos, Assyrians, Achaemenid Persians, Romans, and Macedonians were not deterred, just to name some from the ancient world.
As for judging them against their contemporaries, I think I was. That’s what the 2nd paragraph in the “Too Much Greatness” section was trying to get across. I wanted people to think about the extent to which these older standards of greatness still have relevance today. And I suppose I should suggest that justifying the pyramids with modern tourist revenue isn’t judging the ancient Egyptians by their own standards. At least, I’m skeptical that’s what Khufu was thinking when he decided he needed a pyramid. 🙂
I suppose the best point I could offer is that after these first 3 huge pyramids, later pharaohs decided to stop building such huge monuments in their own honor. It seems they, too, decided the expense and effort was a bit much.
Thanks for your points, though. I always look forward to your ideas and suggestions. Later wonders are in no particular order. I just started with the pyramids of Giza because they are the only one still standing that people can see today.